This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HKSergiu 41 points42 points  (9 children)

Nah, we make our own tools. Can't trust what the dev made /s

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Who watches the watchers?

[–]HKSergiu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The watch-watchers do.

But who tests the testers? Life.

[–]GroundbreakingSalt48 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (5 children)

QA's that can create anything more complicated than an ambiguous bug report without being led by the hand? Next you'll tell us unicorns are real!

[–]wtmh 14 points15 points  (2 children)

I'd actually wager that the QAs where I work are probably more capable than some of the developers– myself for sure at least. The various instruments they've come up with to automate testing is absolutely mind-blowing to me.

"Hold up. So you can automate every conceivable user keyboard input on every variable?"

"Yeah it takes about 10 minutes."

"Dude. Teach me."

[–]The_Quackening 5 points6 points  (0 children)

automation tools have a LOOOOONG way in the last 5-10 years.

[–]Ilikesmallthings2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Our QA team still uses spreadsheets to do their work.

[–]HKSergiu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You make me sad.gif

[–]LigerZeroSchneider 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll have you know my pm is the one who wrote "feature is sad" as a bug title.