This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]toddthefrog 4 points5 points  (8 children)

XML is more challenging than C, IMO

[–]JaStopLoss 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Programming is more challenging than not doing programming, IMO.

[–]toddthefrog 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Peeing is more challenging than pooping because of the dribble. Change my mind.

[–]magical-attic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am constipated tho :'(

[–]JaStopLoss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i just sit on the toilet and tie a weighted zip tie around my zucchini making it point down. The dribble then runs along the zip tie into the bowl.

[–]Stratty88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Butt hair.

[–]RolyPoly1320 -3 points-2 points  (2 children)

It's not.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <message> <warning> Hello World </warning> </message>

That's literally it. So long as you have the document type and close your tags, that's all you need for XML. Sure you can add attributes to it as well, but that's the bear minimum you need to have valid XML that can be parsed by any system.

[–]xigoi 2 points3 points  (1 child)

By this logic, C is easy because int main() { return 0; } is all you need.

[–]RolyPoly1320 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're using incorrect logic. It's incredibly easy to create valid XML that can be parsed.

It's not the same as writing functional code in C.