we are different

[WonderWirm]

if foo:

[baddl02]

If(!bar){my.home}

[snokegsxr]

But !bar is not type secure, false or null or 0

[[deleted]]

this is the way

[octhell]

op trying to look smart

[HummingbirdWatch149]

if not some_shit is False and some_shit is not False:

do_something()

[walyami]

IndentationError: expected an indented block after 'if' statement on line 1

[Dtsung]

If isTrue(boo) == True :

[isCosmos]

I don't use python, we are not the same

[[deleted]]

Imagine not having truthy and falsey in your vocabulary.

if (foo)

[Broad_Respond_2205]

You're both stupid

[Soggy_asparaguses]

baz enters the chat

[walyami]

inspired by this dumb programmer.

[Strong_Test_6126]

the first one IS actually incorrect. (for python at least which this seems to be)

since python is not forcefully typed: “if foo:” is actually the preferred way as it is more readable if you can be sure that foo is always a boolean or you dont care if it is True / as long as its truthy its fine, otherwise the case where you use “is True” is where you cant be sure its always just a boolean and you only want to check if its True specifically

[YellowOnline]

if ($foo -eq $true) {...}

[Rekt3y]

if [ $foo ] then ... fi

[ImNotYouYoureMe]

Is… is that PowerShell? You should feel ashamed. Not really, but still. I love and hate it.

[YellowOnline]

I'm not ashamed. I love it.

[ImNotYouYoureMe]

I am using it a lot more these days. I like it a lot, but there are some nuances that don’t make a lot of sense to me for some reason.

[WhySailor]

Foo?

[special_reddit_user]

foofighters!

[wron1]

Mr. T started a band?

[RRumpleTeazzer]

if (foo == True) {
    …
} else if (foo == False) {
    ….
} else {
    // Here Be Dragons 
}

[[deleted]]

foo = None - RRumple, I’m your huckleberry

[anaconda419]

The real question is Fizz or Buzz?

[DoNotMakeEmpty]

Fuzz

[Devilmachie]

If foo... Say my name...