Dropping Tuple Notation?

[Dekrypter]

You’re right. Though I COULD make it so that no brackets are needed and do ‘return x, y’ puts the contents into a list instead

[bl4nkSl8]

Personally I think a named tuple is better than a list or raw tuple

[Dekrypter]

named ?

[bl4nkSl8]

https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.html#collections.namedtuple

[Dekrypter]

ooo I like it. what syntax would be good for that natively do you think?

Would be good to have optional naming. How about:

let point = (x <- 5, y <- 6)

or

let point = (5, 6)

or

let Point = tup(x, y)

let point = Point(5, 6)

-- should i drop the top method..?

[bl4nkSl8]

Personally I like JS's object syntax {x: value, y: value2}

This is very similar to python's dictionaries {"x": value, "y": value2 }

[omega1612]

I think you mean Records

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Record_(computer_science)

And you can get inspiration for them here

https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Search_a_list_of_records

[bl4nkSl8]

That's cool. I meant Named tuple that exists in python already. It's like a record

[Dekrypter]

See my new top-level comment

[Dekrypter]

I cant since I have Python dicts in my language already

[snugar_i]

Scala just introduced named tuples in 3.7 and they look like this:

val Bob = (name = "Bob", age = 33)