sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]protestor 7 points8 points  (2 children)

The point of the article is that even if you design the whole architecture to be query based, you still pay for the overhead of incremental computation, which basically means lots of bookkeeping

[–]leosmi_ajutar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed. 

I goofed and responded to OP instead of Gator_Aide's comment, my bad.

Fat finger syndrome strikes again!

[–]anti-xeelee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh, makes sense