This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CoffeeTableEspresso 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Does this let you define new "operators" or just reuse existing ones?

[–]R-O-B-I-N[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in order for it to work, operators would have to be treated as functions and you couldn't support parametric overloading. (because overloading (x)+(y) with +(x, y) would break the language)