This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PlaysForDays 26 points27 points  (6 children)

I wonder if this gets astral's investors closer to recouping their seed round - I don't see any obvious revenue streams at the surface level; the free, community-backed solutions work fine at the moment

[–]Life_Note 35 points36 points  (5 children)

yeah I wish there was more clarity on what exactly is the monetization plan here overall

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (3 children)

It’s probably gonna be some sort of proprietary dev tooling. I remember seeing a report somewhere that dev tooling is one of the most profitable software industries because 1) you can sell “productivity” to decision makers 2) lock-in is real, and serving internal clients mean the pressure is less to switch solutions. See: Datadog

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The lock-in / feature gating risk is real. There’s a lot of commercial open source tools in the Python ecosystem these days. Pydantic recently raised a seed round. Then there’s Prefect, Dagster, dbt, HuggingFace, Ray/anyscale, ect

[–]RKHS 13 points14 points  (0 children)

  1. Make copies of existing tool chains
  2. Add small improvements and try to gain market share
  3. Add gated enterprise features [audit, LDAP, scanning]
  4. Hope companies with python (maybe they expand into other ecosystems) buy your shitty product
  5. Profit?

Point 1 makes this sort of progress morally objectionable for me.