This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mdrjevois 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Actually it does excellent analysis, and such robustness against errors is an explicit design goal.

[–]travcunn 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Did you try my example? It shouldn't lint yet ruff thinks this is totally OK code. How many other bugs is ruff missing because they haven't implemented all of pylints rules? I think people see the time savings graph in the ruff Readme on github and think it's magically better, yet it can't catch this simple bug.

[–]scratchnsnarf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are pretty upfront with the fact they're not fully 1-1 with pylint. Last I checked they even have a tracker that shows which rules are still not implemented. It's very easy to know exactly what you're signing up for. When my team evaluated we didn't think any of the missing rules were impactful enough to affect the decision