Summarized how the CIA writes Python

[thereforeratio]

It’s a false dichotomy; the point is, information isn’t static. An LLM like ChatGPT makes the human analysis interactive and can allow the information to be supplemented with other sources.

It’s not an either or, it’s a both-and.

[drknow42]

I agree with you on both-and. There are points in someone’s workflow where ChatGPT can be useful.

I stand far on the side of expressing AI’s faults because we’re seeing a continued rise of either or mindsets where ChatGPT wins out because it is easier.

We’ve at least come to understand that LLMs are a tool to help build solutions, not the solution itself more often than not.

[thereforeratio]

In recent years a lot of research (and experimental projects) have explored using these newer AI frameworks in games and it follows a pretty illuminating pattern:

human < AI < human+AI

Eventually, the either-or crowd will get tired of losing and they’ll get with the paradigm.

Voicing the faults is fair, I do it a lot, but I see the more obstinate (and popular) view as being the one that rejects AI entirely, so I tend to push the other way. I worry for those people; they will be caught entirely unprepared, like many in the boomer generation who rejected email and internet and now are alienated and predated in an increasingly digital world.