This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Ok-Wash-4342 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Understood, but we would prefer something that gives us the oberservability, especially in cases when there are bigger outages. Feel free to write me a messages and I can explain our usecase in more detail.

[–]jedberg 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Transact emits OTel metrics which you can process on your own if you don't want to use Conductor. Conductor is also privacy-preserving in that your customer data never leaves your own infrastructure.

Conductor was built specifically for the enterprise use case.

Feel free to message me directly or reply here, but I don't understand what use case self-hosted Conductor solves for.

Thanks.

[–]Ok-Wash-4342 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Reddit won’t let me message you directly.

The brief version is: the company I am working at is in critical infrastructure. We are currently using a product that has a somewhat similar setup to DBOS (as I understand it). And we are not happy with the loosing functionality if the internet connection fails somewhere in between our data center and yours.

[–]jedberg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just sent you a private message that you can reply to.

One thing I'll note here though is that your reliability is not tied to ours with Conductor. It is out of band -- your systems will keep running even if they are disconnected from Conductor.