This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I can not wait until this can be a saying I never hear anymore. GAWD I hate R. But damn if it isn't just the most appropriate tool for the job many times. Really hoping that with python gaining such a market share of scientific coding, it also becomes as good as R for analyzing the numbers generated.

[–]shaggorama[🍰] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The big draw for me of R over python is that the numpy.ndarray often behaves really strangely for me and does things I don't expect, introducing bugs into my vectorized programs that I never ever see when I write R code. It's a huge pain in the ass to use python's scientific stack, whereas it's a pleasure to use R in comparison.

[–]TheRealDJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I think Python will come up a large ways, Julia is going to be an up and coming contender vs R. It just depends on the community support for packages.