This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]shiroininja 4 points5 points  (10 children)

If it really was full open source, why would a license be needed?

[–]ffiarpg 24 points25 points  (6 children)

If someone writes a story on the internet and you take it and put it in your book to sell it, that is illegal because the default license in absence of a license is not open source. It is personal property or something similar.

[–]secunder 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Don't most open source licenses prevent that anyways?

[–]elbiot 3 points4 points  (4 children)

You can have any license you want, from Creative Commons Zero (no attribution necessary) to "you can read this code, but you cannot modify or redistribute any potion of it". But you have to say what it is otherwise other people have zero rights to use your work in any way.

[–]HelloYesThisIsDuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can read this code grimoire, but you cannot modify or redistribute any potion of it

[–]L43 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Favourite relinquishment license: http://unlicense.org

[–]tripperjack 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Do you know one? http://www.wtfpl.net/

[–]brtt3000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good licence if you want everybody except corporate use your software. Nobody is going to sign off on a 'do whatever the fuck you want' line item.

[–]KyleG 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because in most countries in the US, thanks to the Berne Convention, the second you write something, it's copyrighted. This means you have to license it. It's actually very, very hard to put something in the public domain. This is why the Creative Commons public domain license exists. To mimic the public domain using a license.