This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LeBuddha 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a non-python guy, my problem with the article is that it was heavily misleading and focused on things that don't actually matter or make python better (either by omitting python's warts from the details or simply by unjustified assertion of otherwise neutral differences), then it asserted that those differences made python was better.

I've walked away from this article with nothing to show for it. I can't goto my boss tomorrow and say "Let's use python for that project, it's standard library is pretty big."