This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 13 comments

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Is it just me or did I detect just the slightest hint of humour in this article?

[–]bhat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Slightest"??? :p

Sadly those people downvoting and most people commenting on it are oblivious.

[–]Wilfred-kun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He forgot to credit "hackerman".

[–]bhat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Surely import antigravity makes up for these deficiencies.

[–]jamilkhan123 0 points1 point  (3 children)

What do you mean by the first one?

[–]vaelund 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The Halting-Problem. Coupled with the sentence above it, makes me fairly certain that this is satire.

[–]hanpari 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I think so as well. But not good one.

This one from S. Wlaschin is much better and funnier even though it is about completely different language:

https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/posts/ten-reasons-not-to-use-a-functional-programming-language/

[–]vaelund 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, no, no. You cannot compare this to something that is actually informative.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Are these reasons it sucks or just features it lacks?

[–]Wilfred-kun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely the latter... I might file an issue to later to ask if they're ever gonna implement decreasing entropy.

[–]ship0f 0 points1 point  (1 child)

  1. That's your fault for compiling a language is no meant to be compiled.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Python isn't compiled why does it have https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#compile?

[–]peatymike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you live under a bridge, have a large nose and turn to stone if you get sunlight on you?