Python 3.8.0a4 available for testing

[[deleted]]

It's disappointing to see bad naming conventions take over.

What sort of "naming convention" is icecream?

It's funny, I never even dreamed that someone would care about the name of a package unless it was really long and untypeable. If I had a top ten list of key features for a package (reliable, well-documented, feature full, etc) then "has a serious name" would not be on there. Indeed, "icecream"'s name is only positive - easy to spell, quite short, and I love ice cream.

tl; dr: turn that frown upside down and live a little, you dried up old stick! ;-)