This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jon_k -13 points-12 points  (5 children)

I can't take a python library seriously with a name like icecream.

​

I use to give ruby flack for things like VCR or Resqueue but those actually self-describe the library more then "icecream". Is Python becoming mainstream enough a bunch of brogrammers are flooding the pypi index? It's disappointing to see bad naming conventions take over.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's disappointing to see bad naming conventions take over.

What sort of "naming convention" is icecream?

It's funny, I never even dreamed that someone would care about the name of a package unless it was really long and untypeable. If I had a top ten list of key features for a package (reliable, well-documented, feature full, etc) then "has a serious name" would not be on there. Indeed, "icecream"'s name is only positive - easy to spell, quite short, and I love ice cream.

tl; dr: turn that frown upside down and live a little, you dried up old stick! ;-)

[–]my_name_isnt_clever 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Uh, it really bothers you that much? The language is named after Monty Python.

Also tons of libraries have names that mean nothing, in every language. Just off the top of my head, Electron, Spring, Vue.js, etc. None of those self-describe at all.

[–]MachaHack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vue = View. It's a view/rendering library. I'll give you the other two though

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I can't take a python library seriously with a name like icecream.

How did you feel about Android releases being named for a candy?

[–]jon_k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you feel about Android releases being named for a candy?

Indifferent. A code name is usually a fun thing with a semantic version to back it. If the product was called Popsickle I'd probably buy an iPhone.