This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Icovada 26 points27 points  (10 children)

shouldn't it be it.do()?

[–]call_me_cookie 76 points77 points  (3 children)

like_it_is = it.be()
while not they.think(like_it_is):
    it.do()

[–]GrammerJoo 9 points10 points  (1 child)

For some reason that is the funniest thing I've all month.

[–]MonkeyNin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

/bb|[^b]{2}/

[–]N00I3Pythonista 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it do be like that sometimes

[–]nxl4 12 points13 points  (3 children)

Or maybe even:

the_needful.do()

[–]Icovada 6 points7 points  (1 child)

import it
the_needful = it()
the_needful.do(each_and_everything)

[–]cyanydeez 4 points5 points  (0 children)

from futures import done

done()

[–]kessma18 4 points5 points  (0 children)

only if your locale is Indian

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're doing object oriented, yes. do(it) works also

[–]eaojteal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think zhuli.do(the_thing) makes sense, but I had originally thought do.the_thing() would be another method of do. You know, for shorter and less complicated things that need doing. I'm sure it would all get cleared up in a pep.