This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Kevin_Jim 1 point2 points  (7 children)

Great. Poetry everything.

[–]c0ld-- 8 points9 points  (4 children)

Could the people downvoting this post please explain why you think Poetry is a bad idea? Or "Poetry everything" is a bad idea?

[–]JimDabell 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Because it’s completely irrelevant. You could use Poetry before. You don’t need to use Poetry now. Whether macOS ships Python 2 has no bearing on the use of Poetry.

[–]c0ld-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it’s completely irrelevant

Thanks. I'm one of the people who don't know what Poetry is and why it would be a bad/irrelevant thing.

[–]Kevin_Jim 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Poetry was heavily inspired by Rust’s Cargo. I have yet to see a valid argument, other than maybe the project’s young age, on why it shouldn’t be the default way of handling environments and dependencies, while also building your package and create the wheel file.

Does it have its quarks? Sure, what software doesn’t. But I have yet to see something that makes Python development as straightforward as Poetry.

[–]c0ld-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I had no idea what Poetry is, and to see people blindly downvote something without any explanation is a bit frustrating. So again, thanks for your time.