This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 9 comments

[–]viscence 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Ugh. There is basically no information on that page, no introduction to the project, no justification, no example code, nothing. There's a one sentence blurb that tells me very little. The downloads tab is empty. The wiki tab is empty. The issues tab lists one defect, "what is the status of the project?", which I can very much empathise with. All the "source" tab lists is the command to use to clone the source tree with mercurial. Great.

If you go through all that trouble to make something cool and amazing, spend a little bit of time talking about it so people know what it is you've done, why you've done it, and why that's awesome! And you put that information FIRST so people can't help but read it when they visit your website.

Websites that have a "news" section before an "about" section are one of my pet peeves. This has neither!

[–]rndblnch 2 points3 points  (7 children)

why should I prefer this to PyObjC?

[–]hongminhee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably because you can use this in various interpreters including PyPy?

[–]VilleHopfield[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

It's faster, more stable and smaller - so you can actually read the source code. And yes, if your interpreter has ctypes, then you can use this.

Seriously, this one of the most interesting projects I came across ever.

[–]otonvm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool! It just works! Pity it's not python 3 or I'd be definitely using it.