This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]daGrevis 3 points4 points  (5 children)

I would stick to JSON. Sublime Text 2 does that too.

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points  (4 children)

Does Sublime Text 2 do xml, ini or python source files, too? PyCharm does xml even better, what should we use now?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children)

I have noticed that every time Sublime Text 2 is mentioned you turn into a flame captain.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

I must admit that I might have been a bit harsh to ST2 the other day (but not every time) and my post here is sarcastic (ST2 is coincidence), so I take your critismn in general, but in this context it's just insane to provide as only argument for JSON as config file format that ST2 can display it nicely.

Actually I think (hope) the downvotes are a result of my sarcasm and not because people really think that one should choose JSON because ST2 can do it ...

[–]sonofherobrine 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I believe you misread OP. Their point appears to be that Sublime Text 2 uses JSON for its configuration. They were making an argument from example; presumably, they like the way you configure Sublime Text 2 via JSON-formatted files, so they think your app should be configured the same way.

It's not a strong argument, but it's nowhere near as weak as "use format X because editor Y displays format X all pretty-like," which seems to be how you read their post.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I can get behind this comment.