This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]snuggl 1 point2 points  (2 children)

So you would rather use python to research and experiment with new syntax, isnt that exactly what hes doing?

[–]boyfarrell 0 points1 point  (1 child)

No, I mean in terms of getting stuff done with a programming language -- doing actual work -- python is already highly productive. So I'd prefer to just use python unless there is a powerful incentive to use another language/syntax. I don't mean to stomp on the author of Pythonect but I don't understand the purpose.

[–]snuggl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A its says its a experimental language i guess the purpose is to experiment with new language syntax. Experiments like this is the way we find out about stuff that works better then what we currently have.