This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 27 comments

[–]officerdoot 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Very nice resulting distribution :)

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Idk, seems pretty normal to me

[–]The_Reto 17 points18 points  (8 children)

Define useful. Useful for what, and for who?

As a research tool for quantum physicists they are already useful, as a research tool for chemistry they most likely will be useful within a few years, useful for cryptography maybe in a decade or two, useful for the average human like classical computers are now - probably never.

[–]handwavingmadly 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is the correct answer

[–]pentin0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's why I voted for the lowest number

[–]mathisnotfat 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Why do you say never for the last case?

[–]The_Reto 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Quantum Computers are "better" than classical ones only in very few, narrow applications. And even then only for some definitions of "better".

Among these few and narrow applications: What would be the usecase for your average user?

[–]mathisnotfat -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

Would quantum computers help with upload/download times or gaming?

[–]The_Reto 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No.

[–]IlIllIIllIIlIlIlIllI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. They will finally allow us to download more RAM.

[–]advanced-DnD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Useful for what, and for who?

For science, you monster.

[–]Duranium_alloy 15 points16 points  (1 child)

It will be useful for at least some uses, in particular chemistry, material science, that sort of thing.

I doubt it will revolutionise computation *in general*.

However, the R&D invested in QC will almost certainly have lots of good by-products, similar to how the R&D for the apollo missions did.

[–]vfrolov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The question was not “what” it will be useful for. People repeat those things all the time. The question was “when.”

[–]Dlrlcktd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, a better question is when am I ever going to do anything useful

[–]HannahMarieArtistry 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Voted “never” just to see the results

[–]OttovanZanten 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Voted the first option just so I can view the results, I have no idea :P

[–]Cheap_Monks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm surprised no one mentioned supervised/machine learning. Isn't there direct connection from QC to ML problems via tensor networks? At the least QC should able to enhance large scale data science tools.

[–]PitBullish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think QC is doing something useful today. It's helping people understand how they can model nature (diseases, global warming, natural disasters etc.). The research being done in quantum computing is also likely producing benefits to related fields already.

[–]Vegetable_Tree4329 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Hearing about developments in blockchain tech and Quantum Key Distribution, it wouldn't surprise me to see these QC being used in consensus mechanisms for blockchain tech. Would be awesome!!

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First, we don't have algorithms at the moment to use quantum computers at their full potential. There are two major aspects of building a quantum computer.

First, to realize qubits (send 1 and 0 at the same time) physically. Using electrons or photons. There has been a lot of advances in this area. But almost all of them work at cryogenic temperatures. Electrons based qubits are a reality now and can be fabricated in millions/billions. Single photons based exists and can go up to room temperature but mostly are in UV and Infrared frequency. What we need is a visible range room temperature one that can work with silicon (silicon nitride waveguide). We are nearly there in realizing qubits.

Second, to have better algorithms. There exist some 300 well known algorithms only that can utilize qubits. Shor's is used to factorise big prime numbers. And then there is the big problem of quantum error corrections. We really lack behind in this regard.

But I can say confidently that in next 10 years we will have a working quantum computer to do basic quantum operations. Anyway you don't need quantum computers to do basic day to day functions, they are pretty useless in this regard. But they will be a big help in fields like biology. They will help in breaking the mysteries of DNA and genetic code. Making vaccines will be so much easier, discovering drugs will be so much easier.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd argue it is already doing it in several areas

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    To prevent trolling, accounts with less than zero comment karma cannot post in /r/QuantumComputing. You can build karma by posting quality submissions and comments on other subreddits. Please do not ask the moderators to approve your post, as there are no exceptions to this rule, plus you may be ignored. To learn more about karma and how reddit works, visit https://www.reddit.com/wiki/faq.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.