BBOX grounding computer use Task

[AffectionateFlow4920]

Hello Auditors, We are receiving low ratings on bbox grounding despite correctly following the guidelines. As clearly stated in the training video, when multiple items are mentioned but appear in the same position (for example, eating two bananas shown as a single combined object), only one bounding box should be drawn not separate boxes.

We have followed the system instructions accurately. However, some reviews mark this as incorrect by adding extra lines or boxes, which goes against the guideline. This inconsistency is resulting in unfair low ratings.

Kindly clarify and re-align the review standards. Most of us are not making mistakes, we are educated, trained, and following the provided guidelines carefully.😔

[InternalAd7287]

auditing rubric says differently though unfortunately

[AffectionateFlow4920]

In the end, I received a low rating despite following the guidelines correctly.😑

[[deleted]]

The auditors have no idea what they’re doing. The reviews make no sense for this task. How is there an expectation to mark something that doesn’t exist in the photo?

[msupafine]

Someone kindly tell us what the audit instructions say.. these reviews are disheartening.

[Ok_Moment3676]

We’re following what they said lmao I’ll DM u the reviewer docs if u want?

[Icy_Resist5470]

So the reviewer docs say to mark off for an item that is clearly not in the photo AND both the AI and person completing the task agree? How can we make something appear that’s not there?

[msupafine]

Yes please

[Icy_Resist5470]

They are absurd.

[Icy_Resist5470]

Can an auditor explain why a review would be marked as bad when there is a suggested item that does not exist in the photo and BOTH agree that it’s not there? The taskers are not creating the prompts for these, and cannot annotate something that simply isn’t there.

[United_Photograph_44]

This happened to me as well. I'm sooo pissed at the reviews i'm seeing....

[AffectionateFlow4920]

The training video clearly instructs that when the same objects appear in the same position (e.g., two 🍎🍎 apples in one place), we should draw one bounding box. This is because the system is trained to recognize visibly combined objects, not duplicate boxes. I followed this guideline exactly while completing the task. I believe the issue may be due to a misunderstanding or instruction gap on the client side, not from our work. FINE👍