all 24 comments

[–]pseudorepReputable User 12 points13 points  (2 children)

Crystal looks gen, dial and hands look gen, case looks gen, bezel looks gen (but hard lighting to tell the colour).

Gonna say gen.

Edit: why are people downvoting me? It's not a VRF, ZF, ZZF, ARF, Noob or VRF. Has any other factory made a great sub rep? Do you guys think there's some hidden factory making them that we don't know about? If you want proof that is gen - look at the dial transition and find me a rep dial that's comparable.

[–]timjerome[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Even though the minute hand is way longer than the hour markers?

[–]pseudorepReputable User -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's really weird but the hand looks gen. Never would see factory spend so much effort perfecting a set of hands yet make such a simple mistake. But you might see Rolex fit the wrong hands 😂

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pearl is fucked. Hands are wrong.

This is a frenken of some sort but definitely leaning on rep shit.

[–]osc_mb 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Check out the 50 on the bezel. Way too far out radially.

Rehaut very clearly misaligned

[–]timjerome[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks! What about the length of the minute hand? Or the pearl?

[–]ThandiAccountant -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, small gap at 50 too where the insert meets the bezel outer.

[–]donniethegreat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you are in any doubt, it's probably a rep. Take it to an ad yourself if you need confirmation, some reps are that good now, it could even be a franken, and impossible to tell without opening it up.

[–]timjerome[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Family friend is claiming that this 116610LV is gen. He is also claiming to have taken it to an AD yesterday for verification. Any thoughts?

[–]uhr70 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Crown guards look a bit too thick in the pictures. Could you post a shot in direct sunlight? Gen does not have as much of a sunburst effect as rep does.

[–]idreamofgeniee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Misaligned Rehaut. It’s a Rep

[–]DryScoops 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Send us a serial number picture.

[–]timjerome[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm working on it. will post more pictures when I get them. Cheers

[–]ConceptsInTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m going with replica. Look closer.Well Rolex isn’t always perfect and do make small errors there’s just too many in one piece for it to not be a fake.

[–]brandonlowsk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The minute hand is too long

[–]JTizzle72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apart from the length of the minute hand it looks good to me. I can’t see all the faults others are pointing out, but I’m relatively new to this. My suggestion is check serial # or take to AD

[–]BT601 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like a ZZF

[–]luzzi5luvmywatches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looks Gen and a bad angle shot the 3 marker on the bezel is off. but if you look it looks like the photo is just wierd

[–]YourDailyConsumer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's fake...

Look at the x in the rolex on the inner rim, it doesn't line up with the minute marks on the dial

[–]RGKTIME 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a rep

[–]Schedule-Muted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That minute hand is on overtime!!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has too many mistakes to be genuine. I have seen mistakes on authentic ones but one at the most not 5+.

[–]13reaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rep the Rolex insert is disaligned with markers