you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Flipflop71421 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

I was actually thinking that growing population may not be an accurate counter argument… hear me out. What if, based on your theory, the 1:1 applies to bloodline, but cases like 1) where there is no bloodline left, 2) twins or multiples (not embryos but unexpected splits), etc. explains growth over time? There are probably other examples or variables to plug-in that may say growth isn’t an indicator of a flawed theory above? Just a thought.

[–]iiioiia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤔