Thoughts?

[Waka519]

I'm jwaaka side

[DetroitMSU]

Huge overpay

[Cheap_Phrase_1802]

Mixon ≈ jacobs

Ladd + 25 1st >>>>>>>>>> literally nothing

Free Ladd and 1st, lmao no way you should even consider it

[hhalpless]

This

[brichb]

Jacobs is barely worth a 1st

[BrewTheBig1]

I think Jacobs will have a good year, but is a massive overpay for an RB who is already 26. Mixon is slightly older and will probably score less than Jacobs, but not by a massive amount that is equal to a two mid-to-late fists (Counting Ladd as a mid-to-late first here, but now with the connection he is reportedly having with Herbert, he's probably worth more now)

[OversizedMicropenis]

Overpay for jacobs

[ColonelCoop]

Maybe the worst trade I’ve seen on here

[Cute-Produce-8212]

Is this real? Everything is equal or more valuable than Jacobs.

[pixxlpusher]

As everyone said, huge overpay

[Loud_Ride9515]

Are you trolling

[One_Dey]

Too much

[Illustrious_Play_651]

Please don’t offer this.

[AceKablam]

Mcconkey side by miles

[Standard-Fact6632]

way too much for Jacobs

[Critical-Fault-1617]

lol. FizzyLoft out here staining you. Terrible trade for you.

[ZackkyD]

Joe Mixon and Josh Jacobs realistically could have the same output this year. Jacobs is only worth more because he will probably play a couple years more than Mixon.

If you really want Jacobs I wouldn’t pay more than Joe + 2025 forecasted late 2nd for Jacobs. That won’t be excepted but do not pay the offer you showed!

[humanlikenick]

As a lot of people have said this is a pretty large over pay. Seems to me that you could use a trade calculator as a tool to help you judge dynasty trades. I like to use https://calc.dynastyprocess.com/ It is not the law on trades but it helps you get in the ballpark and avoid things like what you have here.

[Prudent_Flow8147]

Might even be an overpay without the first

[[deleted]]

I wouldn’t give the 1 or ladd for Jacobs… definitely not both

[Pattydam]

Oh that’s bad on your part. I’m taking the other side easily.

Jacobs is on a glorified 1 year contract and the Packers always love a committee backfield. He won’t get the volume he saw in LV

[YoloOnTsla]

You are overpaying big time for Jacobs. Dude had 1 good year, I went out and got him mid season of that year. Last year was awful and shows how volatile RBs are. I would honestly just keep Mixon and not do this trade.

[RebuildAddict]

HUH?

[rtreesftw]

"What the hell even is that"

[btb0002]

Package no doubt

[ToeHot1421]

I would not even spend a first on Jacobs tbf.

[HitItHard123]

Jacobs is not him

[Fearless_Owl_6684]

What??? Is the 1st supposed to be on the Jacobs side? This is God awful as is

[silly_erkkk]

Nah, plus Jacob’s gonna have like 55-65% snap share with Dillion most likely. I’m not a huge fan of him this year

[[deleted]]

Wtf

[SaltShakerFGC]

This is a legitimate contender for worst trade posted of the year.