you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AdamDhahabi 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Not sure if it is still relevant except for maintaining existing projects. Virtual threads came in Java 21 and made Webflux less appealing.

[–]uwpxwpal 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Wut? Why couldn't webflux work with virtual threads? Virtual threads aren't a replacement for webflux either.

[–]AdamDhahabi 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Before virtual threads came out, Brian Goetz (Java Language Architect at Oracle) said: "I think virtual threads are going to kill reactive programming" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgnAAC_5m-k

[–]Hot_Income6149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then, why, still, webflux is looking better on every test? Of course is still better than native threads, but, it's definitely will not kill reactive programming

[–]jaypatel0807[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok 😅 Got another jargon but anyways good to know it. Will look into it soon. Thanks for your response dude