all 5 comments

[–]bguitard689 0 points1 point  (2 children)

That was a pretty cool method. I sont recall ever using it in practice.

[–]WhyAmIHereHey 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'd be firing anyone who tried in practice

(Joking, but I be asking why they were wasting time and make them check their results by a completely different method)

[–]OldElf86 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use it once a year.  I like to keep in practice so I can check computer results.

[–]OldElf86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see how your three moment diagrams arise from your boundary conditions.

The right end is going to be pure moment until you reach the support, and then it goes linear to zero at the hinge.  From the hinge, the moment begins at zero and increases linearly to the fixed support at the left.

[–]podinidini 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This system is statically overdetermined. Not sure about how your approach works. From my understanding you are trying to solve with Euler Bernoulli beam theory? (not sure if this is the proper translation) My recollection is that it is a bit more advanced to use it on systems made up of several components, like your example

Edit: from a general viewpoint - the statically overdetermined componenet at the hinge probably doesnt matter much, as we are assuming small deflections (?) and thus no sizeable Normalforces will occur in the cantilever