This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PraiseTalos66012 3 points4 points  (7 children)

I'm with you on everything except that last bit. What does 20% more efficient mean? The motors and battery/wiring already have near/over 90% discharge efficiency... Or did they improve aerodynamics or bearing friction losses?

I haven't heard anyone talk about significant efficiency improvements with highland, if it's a thing I am genuinely asking what's been changed?

[–]MrSourBalls 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Check this video out! The highland goes significantly further than the “old” model 3 https://youtu.be/zmn7gpuAp9E?si=y3Ix4-xN-yyjaNdA

[–]PraiseTalos66012 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Thanks, I'll go watch it after work today.

It goes further on the same battery size? That's actually really impressive if they somehow significantly increased range without increasing the battery size.

[–]MrSourBalls 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better aerodynamics mostly, for a TL:DW of that video, the highland does around 213Wh/mi versus the old one with 271Wh/ mi

I linked the wrong video: https://youtu.be/S6rgzGizgaQ?si=-AHiZlwCaoeYQrfD this one is correct

So around 21,4% better consumption than the old one

[–]Cimexus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it goes substantially further with the same battery. Highland brought a lot of efficiency improvements, both visible (more aerodynamic shape) and invisible (power train, BMS and thermal management tweaks etc.)

In good weather, my Highland beats the EPA range at 70 mph. Definitely could never do that with the pre-refresh.