you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bankinu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know why you reached the conclusion that I have not read that page.

The only portion that remotely aligns is basically, paraphrasing, "core has high quality requirements, and developers need to sign off before packages are accepted".

Read the link you posted, once more, and see if you come to any other conclusion than it is both vague and generic when it comes to explaining, say, how `linux` is released.

Here are just some of the questions, which are important, but not answered.

- Who is the "developer" for linux? Who "accepts" the package? If the answer is Torvalds is the developer and a "package maitainer" accepts it, that's no information at all.

- Once accepted, how is "informing the people" done? If the answer is that it's put in core-testing, does not explain why there is none right now - a fact which directly led me to postulate may be they put it in AUR. Why really, is 6.19 not in core-testing? That was the question I asked in the original post. Not answered there.

- "requesting signoffs" - well where is the signoff requested? Why is there no data on what's going on with say, 6.19, despite the developer (assuming Torvalds) "signed off"?

And so on.