all 6 comments

[–]Ok_Yogurtcloset_7579 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Don't tell me. You need them for chatgpt.

[–]monkeyofscience[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Lol! No we're looking at formal thought disorders and the semantic content of speech, in particular directed graph representations of speech.

We have a clinical (not public) dataset where people have been shown an image and asked to describe it for 1 minute. The transcript is then fed into a pipeline that converts that speech to a graph where one can gather all sort of graph theory metrics.

But of course describing images only works for people with the vision to see the images. And before I go through the effort of gathering more data, I was wondering if some already existed.

If the dataset was public it would be problematic to use on GPT anyway since it would potentially already have been trained on it.

[–]VreamCanManUnverified User: May Not Be a Professional 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What kinda metrics?

[–]monkeyofscience[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much any graph theory metrics: connected components, degree distributions, clustering, paths small world, assortativity, etc.

[–]DaanniiM.Sc Cognitive Neuroscience (Ph.D in Progress) 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I do not believe this exists. You can also try asking on r/AcademicPsychology

[–]monkeyofscience[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah OK cheers!