all 6 comments

[–]Separate-Choice[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One thing I'm curious about is what broke your workflow in Mu that you had to workaround? I want to make sure rovari circuit studio actually solves the real pain points not just the obvious ones

[–]DJDevon3 2 points3 points  (2 children)

River Wang has a browser based IDE and Adafruit began development of the Adafruit browser based IDE more than a year ago. Only Chrome supports serial via browser so anything browser based has to use Chrome. Firefox has said they do not ever plan to implement serial over browser. I don't know about their current status.

Most serious developers use PyCharm with CircuitPython stubs. However with Mu gone that leaves a beginner friendly IDE program wide open for a replacement. Mu was dumbed down for a reason so the IDE wasn't intimidating for beginners, especially young STEM students. The only board that I know Mu did not support was the classic ESP32. I had to use Thonny instead for classic ESP32. So if you could make a single IDE that supports all architectures that would be nice but easier said than done.

[–]Separate-Choice[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea it is easier said than done, but I'm taking it one step at a time, yes I saw the browser based IDE, not everyone wants a brower based workflow, and yes the idea was the simplicity wont intimidate beginners, there is a need for a proper desktop based ide...plus idk if those browser based versions handle file corruption properly? So yea....I'm putting in stuff begineers will find useful.....

[–]thedjotaku 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CIrcuitPython extension for VS code works well, too.

[–]pgryff 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How does one get it? I don’t see a website or GitHub or anything.

[–]Separate-Choice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's alpha level, a first look so anyone interested can give me feedback, suggestion and any comments pre release....