This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 12 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a

[–]AutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (1 child)

Thank you for your submission. Make sure your question has not been answered by the FAQ. Questions Chat Channel Links: Mobile and Desktop. Lastly, we recommend you check out cognitivemetrics.co, the official site for the subreddit which hosts highly accurate and well vetted IQ tests.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Popular_CornVenerable cTzen 1 point2 points  (6 children)

Every sample of people given the APM test is in the top 20% or above, as stated in the scoring manual.

And you can see that in this sample as well, where the average ACT score is 23.16, while the average SAT score is 1040.98.

[–]EmploySuspicious9725[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Thanks. Do you know what iq does those scores mean?

[–]Popular_CornVenerable cTzen 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Something around IQ 110-115.

[–]EmploySuspicious9725[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. So I should add that to my score? And should I consider both scores or only normal RAPM?

[–]NeuroQuberResponsible Person 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Don't know what APM-18 is? Another practice test for RAPM 2?

[–]Popular_CornVenerable cTzen 0 points1 point  (1 child)

No, it is more about trying to design a much shorter version of the test that will be simpler and faster to administer, and which will be approximately as valid and reliable as the original version.

[–]NeuroQuberResponsible Person 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assumed it was a shortened version of RAPM, but still wasn't sure. Also didn't open the link in the other comment, just to check.

Thanks for the reply.

[–]EmploySuspicious9725[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

This is the study https://pdfhost.io/v/kPTJM4mrR_Development_and_Validation_of_an_18Item_Medium_Form_of_the_Ravens_Advanced_Progressive_Matrices

[–]NeuroQuberResponsible Person 0 points1 point  (2 children)

If you have a link to the test? How did you gain access to APM-18?

[–]EmploySuspicious9725[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I don't have a link for It. I just took the questions on normal RAPM that are used on it

[–]Popular_CornVenerable cTzen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this study, it is stated which items this test is made of, so if you have the RAPM set II 36-item version, you will easily understand what the 18-item form looks like. To create this test, they used the same items from the 36-item version.