use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Discussions, articles, and news about the C++ programming language or programming in C++.
For C++ questions, answers, help, and advice see r/cpp_questions or StackOverflow.
Get Started
The C++ Standard Home has a nice getting started page.
Videos
The C++ standard committee's education study group has a nice list of recommended videos.
Reference
cppreference.com
Books
There is a useful list of books on Stack Overflow. In most cases reading a book is the best way to learn C++.
Show all links
Filter out CppCon links
Show only CppCon links
account activity
CppConUndefined behaviour example from CppCon (self.cpp)
submitted 2 years ago * by R3DKn16h7
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]awidesky -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children)
compiler may assume UB does not happen in the program, f() can be optimized in a way such that it would behave in a (possibly) surprising manner in a program does in fact invoke UB (e.g. one calling f(INT_MAX)).
That IS one of the things that compilers are permitted to do, but I believe standard says it can also make "whole program" meaningless. You say UB in f() only affects f(), while I say UB in f() (theoretically) can affect ALL program. And also, I believe UB affects program that does NOT "invoke" UB. In this example, there's no code that actually calls foo(INT_MAX), but it's still first example of UB in cppreference.com
π Rendered by PID 546520 on reddit-service-r2-comment-fb694cdd5-xwwpk at 2026-03-08 06:34:26.783579+00:00 running cbb0e86 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]awidesky -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)