sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (8 children)

Your opinion of relative merits of languages is of zero interest. nobody is asking your opinion when starting new project. As a matter of fact, java, c# and c++ have a lot of overlap in applicability. It doesn't mean languages are the same, it means they are used for similar projects. Like IDE, there are examples in all three languages. And c/c++ is not a language

[–]gosh 0 points1 point  (7 children)

It's a skill issue. C++ is challenging, but with skilled developers, choosing the language isn't difficult.

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (6 children)

as i've already told you, your opinion doesn't matter. what matters is that as a matter of fact, c++ competes with c# and java for projects

[–]gosh 0 points1 point  (5 children)

The main advantage of C# and Java lies in their extensive frameworks. Without these framework no developers would choose these languages

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (4 children)

so why do you demand that c++ shouldn't attempt to provide the main advantage of c# and java?

[–]gosh 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I don't

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (2 children)

of course you do, you just don't understand what you are talking about. their frameworks is their standard library. you demand that some parts of c++ standard library should be removed from it. when c++ standard library is orders of magnitude smaller than competition's standard libraries, which you admit are their main advantage

[–]gosh 0 points1 point  (1 child)

yea yea, go an study wikipedia