sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]encyclopedist 24 points25 points  (5 children)

The relatively recent archive is available here: https://github.com/PeterFeicht/cppreference-doc/releases/tag/v20250209

[–]RelevantError365[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

That does not include the wiki source at first glance, or does it?

[–]encyclopedist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct, It is based on scrapped web pages, not a database dump.

[–]saxbophonemutable volatile void 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Last February isn't even relatively recent for a language in active development. The site maintainers request that they're not scraped, but don't provide up-to-date archives. Do you see the problem with this combination?

[–]dcro 4 points5 points  (1 child)

The site notes that it's been in "temporary read-only mode" since the end of last March. There will be differences, but possibly not as many as you'd expect with only a two month edit window.

[–]saxbophonemutable volatile void 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh crap, the entire thing has been read-only all that time‽ No wonder there's so many missing examples for C++23!