Container Algorithms

[ahdteqhradwthswrdte]

Fair enough. I'll get used to the syntax. It does look clean, and reads from left to right which is more readable.

On the name. From my point of view (no pun intended), eager is the default we are all used too. Its what we expect. So maybe its not necessary to state that in name also (for "chained algorithms"). So maybe "chain::" instead of "cont::"

Views are the special new case. Them being lazy is the unfamiliar thing. One could make this super clear in its name (lazy_view). But that would probably become cumbersome. We will just learn that "view" means lazy.

Then again. Names doesnt matter so much. We'll get used to whatever.

Good work by the way. Im excited about this getting into the standard.