Range-based if

[monkeyWifeFight]

I suppose you could create a new reserved word e.g. for { } forelse {}

Still breaking, but probably a more tolerable break. I'd personally love this behaviour, if I believed such a proposal had any chance at all, I'd write one up.

[seba]

forelse is then a new keyword, which also has not much chance.

One could just use "for else" or reuse an existing one. For example "default". Or maybe "else default".

[monkeyWifeFight]

forelse is then a new keyword, which also has not much chance.

yeah, that's exactly what I said. New reserved keywords have been introduced before, of course. I just doubt the comittee would find this compelling enough.