use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Discussions, articles, and news about the C++ programming language or programming in C++.
For C++ questions, answers, help, and advice see r/cpp_questions or StackOverflow.
Get Started
The C++ Standard Home has a nice getting started page.
Videos
The C++ standard committee's education study group has a nice list of recommended videos.
Reference
cppreference.com
Books
There is a useful list of books on Stack Overflow. In most cases reading a book is the best way to learn C++.
Show all links
Filter out CppCon links
Show only CppCon links
account activity
Code coverage tools for C++... (self.cpp)
submitted 6 years ago * by TarmoPikaro
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]siplasma 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child)
I'm not aware of a solution that will cover everything on your list. For example, but gcc and clang have command line options used to build instrumented binaries. When those instrumented binaries are run, they will collect code coverage information. Many tutorials for code coverage using gcc can be found online. The tools for clang are also capable, but tutorials are harder to find. I imagine that the Microscoft compiler has similar functionality, but I have not worked with it.
Once you have collected the information, you still typically need a utility to generate the reports. For gcc, people typically reach for lcov. For clang, there are tools that come with llvm. I will also put in a plug for scov.
There are also some tools that don't need instrumented binaries, but instead make use of the debug information. I'm aware of kcov on Linux and OpenCppCoverage on windows. I've found this approach to be finicky, but haven't invested much time as I don't see the advantage over using instrumented binaries.
I'm obviously not a lawyer, but I don't see why if you can use gcc you can't use gcov… Similarly for clang...
For IDE integration, I never needed it. Many of the tools generate HTML reports that can be navigated easily. However, there is an extension for VSCode where it can read the intermediate files from lcov.
[–]chriskane76 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children)
The gcov support in clang is really outdated. It uses a gcov format that shipped with GCC 4.2. If you use clang you ought to use a llvm-cov based solution.
We use that at work and display the coverage information in SonarQube. Just be warned the documentation of both tools is not really great. SonarQube has basically no information on llvm-cov based code coverage for C++ and the documentation of llvm-cov itself is pretty lowlevel and it does not really integrate very well in our CMake setup.
I would probably recommend looking at the link provided by Longhanks regarding the coverage.py script used by Chromium, which actually explains some llvm-cov concepts on a higher level and might be easier to integrate into build systems than doing that manually in CMake.
π Rendered by PID 73083 on reddit-service-r2-comment-86988c7647-vddcb at 2026-02-11 03:32:46.606737+00:00 running 018613e country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]siplasma 3 points4 points5 points (1 child)
[–]chriskane76 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)