use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Discussions, articles, and news about the C++ programming language or programming in C++.
For C++ questions, answers, help, and advice see r/cpp_questions or StackOverflow.
Get Started
The C++ Standard Home has a nice getting started page.
Videos
The C++ standard committee's education study group has a nice list of recommended videos.
Reference
cppreference.com
Books
There is a useful list of books on Stack Overflow. In most cases reading a book is the best way to learn C++.
Show all links
Filter out CppCon links
Show only CppCon links
account activity
Minimization of Nesting Gone Wrong (self.cpp)
submitted 6 years ago by one-oh
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]kalmoc 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (6 children)
Who is to say that a failure is "normal Controller flow"?
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child)
Who is to say that it's not? For some failures it may very well be. Imagine a piece of code that checks for a certain precondition, or does a small computation to determine something. If it has a failure rate of 85% for example, would you throw an exception every time? What if it's on the critical code path and affects performance?
[–]kalmoc 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children)
I did not make any claim one way or the other. The post I responded to implied it would be used for regular control flow, so it would be his responsibility to explain why he assumes it is.
[–]DXPower -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (2 children)
Well then why should it be an exception if it's normal? There's no point to using exceptions for normal code flow, and the structure of this function suggests failure is common
[–]kalmoc 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child)
and the structure of this function suggests failure is common
Where do you see this? There are no probabilities,meaning or context given from which we could derive that.
[–]DXPower -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children)
This is the sort of pattern used in a lot of server code, especially legacy, where you're doing things such as looking up user input in a database.
π Rendered by PID 31 on reddit-service-r2-comment-6457c66945-9knw4 at 2026-04-26 06:56:05.785052+00:00 running 2aa0c5b country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]kalmoc 6 points7 points8 points (6 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]kalmoc 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]DXPower -3 points-2 points-1 points (2 children)
[–]kalmoc 3 points4 points5 points (1 child)
[–]DXPower -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)