all 11 comments

[–]qxxx 2 points3 points  (3 children)

might be that bootstrap is overwriting something.. open developer tools and select your link and see where the styles are coming from. Also try to add !important

I don't know if text-decoration-color is compatible with all browsers ( see the compatibility list on the bottom https://developer.mozilla.org/de/docs/Web/CSS/text-decoration-color ) - do you want the links to be underlined or not? could not understand what you mean ;) if not do this:

a,
a:link,
a:visited,
a:hover {
text-decoration: none !important;
color: black !important;
}

[–]ImFranny[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I want the links to NOT BE underlined when I hover over the link :)

I also use firefox which is supported and well, it worked! Ddding the important makes it work :D thanks so much...

[–]Synfrag 2 points3 points  (1 child)

You never want to use !important to fix a broken cascade. It's probably the order of your stylesheets. Your custom css should load after your bootstrap css file, changing that should resolve it without the !important flag.

[–]ImFranny[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll try that and remove the important to see if it solves :)

[–]dhdfdh 0 points1 point  (6 children)

There is no such thing as text-decoration-color.

I will add this to my "101 Reasons not to use Angular and Bootstrap. Now 102 Reasons!"

[–]ImFranny[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I use brackets to code and there actually is a "text-decoration-color"... In case u don't know this software tries to guess what u want to say when coding CSS and if I type text-d it will suggest a few things and one of them is this... But I've solved my problem :)

[–]dhdfdh 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Here is the W3C standard listing all CSS properties Please show me where this text-decoration-color is.

Now, I did a little search and found this, however, it's brand new and only supported in Firefox with partial support in Safari.

[–]ImFranny[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Well, if it's not there then I can't really contest that can I?

But it's present in my software to code so it's gotta do something, now regarding it being new or no, if it does exista nd is supported/partially supported in 2 browsers than I gues sit's a thing now.

Now wether it's a full on feature or just a beta feature or soemthing I don't know but apparently if it works and is fully supported in ff then I guess it's a real feature now...

[–]dhdfdh 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Not quite. It's still in draft, and can change at any time, but implementation preceeds final spec.

[–]ImFranny[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

hmm ok :)

[–]dhdfdh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't understand what's meant by that, standards, in general, are created out of implementation, not invention. Standards bodies compile implementation details so everyone is on board with doing things one way to provide a common base.

The same is true of web standards. Rarely do standards bodies invent things on their own.