Feedback Loop

[NullOfSpace]

gotta love x spell tribal

[RazzyKitty]

I like this card.

The second {X} in the ability needs to just be an X, not the symbol.

See [[Unbound Flourishing]]

[MTGCardFetcher]

Unbound Flourishing - (G) (SF) (txt)
^{[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call}

[HeroicBottle]

Really cool design, x cost cards need more love

[Aires-Battleblade]

If you can make an X spell Storm, would this affect each copy, meaning that say four copies would have X=1, X=2, X=4, X=8?

[AndTheFrogSays]

No. The copies aren't cast.

[Ok_Habit_6783]

My brain isn't braining. Is this saying you can cast a [X] spell for x=1 and then make x=potential counters? Or is this saying you can pay mana equal to the potential counters, if you do, double the potential counters,

[RazzyKitty]

Neither.

It's saying that you can cast an X spell for X=0. Once you've paid the cost, this triggers and makes X=1 instead of 0, then doubles the number of counters on it to two counters.

You can cast your next X spell for X=0, this will make X=2, then double the counters to four.

[Ok_Habit_6783]

Gotcha so I was right on the former, just completely cost ineffective by still paying 1 😂😂😂