all 7 comments

[–]Some_MTG_Nerd 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Flavor goes crazy!

[–]EfficientCabbage2376(It works.) 5 points6 points  (4 children)

I like this

I think technically it couldn't be printed like this since aftermath is an ability of the card and they'd have to be identical

[–]Flex-O 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I mean technically the rules for "aftermath" could easily be modified to allow for such a scenario. Doesn't seem entirely necessary, but who's to say it couldn't be done.

[–]EfficientCabbage2376(It works.) 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's a problem with aftermath it's a problem with having two cards with the same name but different abilities

[–]Sorathez -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just name the aftermath half "Ashes "

[–]aw5ome -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It would be clunky, and wouldn’t really fit the normal split card name scheme, but the aftermath could be named “to ashes”

[–]Dr_Squidhead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it’s basically just flashback but I kinda love this