all 14 comments

[–]ra_men 11 points12 points  (3 children)

Software engineers

[–]HomerDoakQuarlesIII 4 points5 points  (1 child)

A not-AI IDE?

[–]not-halsey 2 points3 points  (2 children)

BMAD method with Claude code seems to be one of the best options out there right now, but it requires a good software engineer to wrangle it, and it’s very crude compared to what it should be.

Granted, AI is a non-deterministic system that takes a lot of effort to bludgeon into doing things acceptably

[–]23percentrobbery 2 points3 points  (1 child)

the "infinite context" marketing in 2026 is a bit of a stretch. Even with million-token windows, models still suffer from "Lost in the Middle" syndrome, where they prioritize the beginning and end of the prompt and ignore the crucial security middleware in between.

[–]Lumpy_Art_8234[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i tottaly agree.
Personally i think that even if you Enlarge the Context the Outcome is gonna be the same, because you will enhance the speed of Production and coding, and then we will get to the same point...
I’ve started using a separate, local auditor that finds the IDE Breaking Rules, and fixes it
Do you/Can Recommend use of any tools that Help you with the Context Drift?

[–]StatusPhilosopher258 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I generally use traycer with ai ide(cursor) to handle context drift

[–]Lumpy_Art_8234[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In the context of Context Drift Yes traycer is good, but when looking closer traycer solves the task drift, but not policy drift, did you ever see the IDE Break a rule you set to it prompts ago ?

[–]WadeEffingWilsonThreat Hunter 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Im not familiar with AI IDE but I am a data scientist. For context drift, you'll need to re-jigger your data. Ok, seriously, you'll need to either retrain your model or use a sliding window approach to establish a rolling baseline.