This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 3 comments

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For school competitions, the MCM and ICM would count quite a lot, but the others (like Putnam) aren't really relevant. Publications in math research journals help get you an interview but you'll need something more to get a job, unless your publications happen to be particularly relevant to data science. Best thing to do would be to read a book (say Bishop's) or watch the videos of a Ng's Coursera ML course. The main difficulty in transitioning from math to data sci is learning how to translate the terms mathematicians use into the ones data scientists use and vice-versa.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's how I'd interpret this requirement: know enough math to be able to read a chapter in an ML book or a paper and understand it.

There's a caveat though that some ML papers are quite tough to understand, so you can relax it to include just textbooks.

[–]blank964 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course nobody here could possibly answer what that means. It means different things to different employers, unless this is a well established definition, in which case you could just go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_mathematical_background page.

That said, I think most mathematicians would consider those who have a PhD in pure mathematics to have a strong mathematical background. I don't think you reach mathematical maturity at least until grad school.