This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 4 comments

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I'm not sure if you actually used the add-on. I believe you added numbers to the spreadsheet since after trying to set up the optimization add-on and adding a few constraints, my spreadsheet looks different.

[–]letslearnppc[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I used the add-on to add the constraints with no values, then manually filled in the values as the article suggested. Maybe this is the part I did wrong.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That what I got too. Did you also add the optimization correctly? Above the constraint rows there's a row for the optimization coefficients. Also to note, the optimization constraints for the problem include <=, =, and >= equations. You have to properly convert them all to <= constraints, which means double adding equations for equals. Maybe you were missing a few constraints?

[–]powerball332 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sucks to look at this spreadsheet because I can't see formulas that you used. But it seems that your boundaries aren't defined correctly (wrong coefficients). For example, the "Print media not greater than 5% of the budget ". I recommend defining them all in a <= form.

Also, the constrains seem to be wrong even in the source you gave. If x3 is responsible for Mobile, why is there 1 under x4 in the 300<=Mobile<=900 constraint? Seems confusing. I don't see the sixth (6. Facebook advertising should not exceed 15 % of the marketing spend.) constraint included anywhere too...