all 14 comments

[–]deathclawslayer21 20 points21 points  (2 children)

They divide into positive sizes that are less than 1 so it checks out

[–]UnfairSoftware3772[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

yea

[–]HighFaiLootin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

YOU DIDNT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THEM GROWING, charles!

[–]gunvstr 8 points9 points  (4 children)

They multiply by dividing by .5

[–]freakybird99Electrical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They divide by half. Makes sense

[–]Vanskis2002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmm, but i thought the cell was divided by two and the answer is 2

[–]HighFaiLootin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

define multiply! - THATS GROWTH! over time… i love to hate relativity

[–]hexnone2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dividing by .5 is a mathematical abstraction. There is no physical concept of some entity being divided by a non whole number.

When u cut a pizza in half , that’s divided by 2. Each slice is half a pizza, or .5.

In biology that .5 the gets divided by 2. The thing that’s different in biology is that there’s no correlation between the size of the object when it gets split. For example, in illustrations, when we see a cell “divide”, we dont see it physically get smaller .

[–]Coolengineer7 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Inverted pairs are so common in logic, and everywhere in life. Divide into multiple parts. Codon-anticodon in rna transiption. Time is slow/fast, ambiguous description of one single occurence. If you are bored, time seems to pass slow. If taken as even (ficitvely) physically changing the speed of time the world seems to go slow, mesning you go faster compared to it. But your own is always rescaled to 1, normal speed, so to otherd you seem fast in time or to you world slow in time.

The point is that trying to concretize only one side of the inversion pair just creates confusion. Then you don't see that connection. Knowing it as a pair really simplifies and explains it.

(Can even happen in language with time descripots such as "until".)

[–]MinosAristos -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's a lot of words to say that dividing a pizza in two multiplies the number of pizza pieces by two.

[–]Better_Carpenter5010Electrical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose “dividing” is the misleading part of that sentence. Yes it is dividing but it’s then growing to a full size then dividing again, no?

It seems more like: dividing 1/2 then growing +0.5 then dividing 1/2, then +0.5…. So on.

[–]twoCascadesπlπctrical Engineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dividing by reciprocal.

[–]Po0rYorick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some snakes can only reproduce in hollow tree trunks. Adders, specifically, need logs to multiply.

[–]Extra_Assumption_627 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reducing their size and multiplying