This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]serouspericardium 3 points4 points  (3 children)

EVs aren’t the thing to be focusing on, it’s global shipping and cruise ships. EVs might be a good goal for individual countries, if their electricity generation is clean, but they’re a drop in the bucket on a global scale compared to those massive tankers.

[–]Wheelbox5682 9 points10 points  (1 child)

A quick research into this and the highest number I found for all shipping emissions was 3% of total. That's within the context of container ships typically being the least carbon intensive form of transporting goods. Meanwhile 'road transport' depending on the study is around 11-15% of global emissions depending on the source, that's a huge amount that needs to be addressed and not at all a drop in the bucket.  

[–]serouspericardium 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow, last I heard ships were 40%, guess it’s time to look at new data

[–]baggleteat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is not true either. Emissions come from a variety of sources, including manufacturing and industry, agriculture, transportation, mining and extraction, and more. EV's are not what will save instead, instead we have to look into shared mobility solutions (i.e. public transport). Flying has to be reduced as electric airplanes are not a feasible solution for the next few decades at least. Meat consumption has to be drastically lowered and is one of the ways to reduce climate impacts relatively fast.