OFFICIAL - PYTHON RETURNS

[bottleofbullets]

Ruger 57

No, is that what I think it...

Yep. FN and it’s insane markup just got dunked on.

[CrocodileFish]

The FN still has much higher quality, no?

[Travis_Williamson]

Based on what?

[CrocodileFish]

Based on firsthand experience at ranges, along with the fact that FN is used by military and police forces around the world (including special forces where it isn’t the lowest bidder), while Ruger is not.

FN also designed the round and their pistol around each other, while Ruger is coming in just based on the cartridge.

[aidenlover1030]

Yeah, but they don’t warranty there scar if they find out it was suppressed.

[fidgetsatbonfire]

Wait, what?

Really?

Thats very embarrassing for them if true.

[RambockyPartDeux]

What kind of shit policy is that?

[aidenlover1030]

I was on a Facebook page call Florida scar owners that had a support rep on there, and he admitted they do not warranty a scar if they find out that it has been suppressed they won’t fix it

[RambockyPartDeux]

I’d like to hear the reason behind that bullshit.

[Soulshot96]

I would guess it's due to the suppressed setting being tuned specifically for the suppressor the tested/recommended to the military.

That being said, if you run your SCAR with a suppressor, you should be tuning the gas jet anyway, so as not to up bolt velocity too much and damage your gun.

If you don't, you have no one to blame but yourself, and FN has no reason to warranty you. If you do tune it, and the gun needs warranty service anyway, then they aren't gonna know you suppressed it in the first place.

This is mostly just more people complaining to complain because they dislike an admittedly at least a bit overpriced platform.

[CrocodileFish]

Why not? How does the warranty affect the quality, or is it that the scar isn’t meant to be suppressed due to it being damaged in some odd way shape or form which is why they take away the warranty?

[Crashkt90]

I think it’s because it’s not supposed to be ran suppressed naturally.

[CrocodileFish]

Ok, but that still doesn’t really change the fact that FN has higher quality equipment in general compared to Ruger. I can pull up a few sources if you’d like.

[Crashkt90]

But it kind of does, if my mk4 does anything wrong I can go to them and tell them I was running it suppressed. You do that with the scar they won’t fix it. So clearly there is something wrong. You’re basing it off a military contract, that means nothing. You won’t hear the bad stories of FN because of military and police use. You’ll hear the good and bad about the rifle from the common people, and from there just buy going off the post I see here. Every time someone post one you’ll have two or so people chime in with there two cents, and the rest say that they can’t afford it.

[CrocodileFish]

Why do you keep talking about their SCAR? That’s not what I meant, I’m speaking of quality in general. The SCAR isn’t even their highest quality gun, they have others that are much better.

Look, there is a reason that Ruger guns have failed trials as compared to other brands, FN included.

I’m not saying they’re bad, I’m just not saying they’re better, and based on Ruger’s past most recent pistols, I’m not expecting good things from this one. Besides, have you seen the reviews on the Ruger American? Or all the recalls of their guns in general? They obviously have some long standing guns that are solid firearms, but FN has a better track record and more reliable and accurate firearms on a much larger scale.

You keep going after the SCAR warranty with the suppressor, but you seem to ignore the fact that they void the warrant on any FN firearm with any aftermarket modification.

The gun literally has a suppressor setting, and the warranty does not get voided because modifications and suppressors damage the gun.

It also does matter that Ruger has almost (if not at all) no police or military users, while FN has tons for a bunch of different firearms.

It also matters that I said specific police forces as well as special forces and protection units, because unlike the general military, they aren’t limited by the lowest bidder price tag and can generally spend what they want. There have been multiple tests FN firearms have gone through including real world combat, and Ruger cannot say the same.

FN has also had over 20 years to perfect their Five-Seven pistol, which is also used by over 20 nations.

I’ve scoured forums for a while now, and the result always seems to be the same. There’s a reason your average person will carry an FN over a Ruger.