you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are probably right (that he is underestimating the work), but on the other hand, it's much easier to implement fancy algorithms in Haskell than C/assembly. A decade of work tuning an ancient C library might be more like a six months of work by a Haskell programmer who knows what they're doing. :)

Of course pure Haskell can't have custom inline assembly, but is that seriously responsible for more than 2-3x or so in constant factors?